Jan272022 by Orville JaneleNo Comments

Delay on Sue Gray’s Report of PM Johnson’s Partygate Scandal

News

As Prime Minister Boris Johnson leaves for North Wales, the wait for senior civil servant Sue Gray’s Partygate scandal report involving the PM will be delayed. The ‘Partygate’ controversy had the whole country engaged in discussions for weeks after the police launched a formal probe of the “‘bring your own booze” (BYOB) party taking place in Downing Street. The parties are in direct violation of multiple and mandatory pandemic restrictions ordered by the government through the Prime Minister, during the critical periods when the COVID-19 virus was spreading across London and in the UK.

What was PM Johnson’s Role in the Partygate Scandal?

Boris Johnson’s position as the Prime Minister of UK is hanging by a thread as he tries to wriggle himself out two police investigations related to the rule-breaking BYOB parties that transpired in government offices during the lockdown. The key issues of this scandal includes whether Johnson ignored the concerns for the party, when he learned about the May 2020 BYOB party, and whether the gathering breached Covid-19 restrictions. Furthermore, he was also accused of misleading the Parliament which can be a resign-worthy matter.

Johnson answered at the weekly Prime Minister’s Questions, that the staff completely followed coronavirus rules. His response to the leaked video that led to the resignation of former press secretary Allegra Stratton where his colleagues joked about the party during a mock press conference was that there were no rules broken.

The key issues of this scandal includes whether Johnson ignored the concerns for the party, when he learned about the May 2020 BYOB party, and whether the gathering breached Covid-19 restrictions. Furthermore, he was also accused of misleading the Parliament which can be a resign-worthy matter.

PM Boris Johnson continues to refuse the calls for him to resign during the weekly Prime Minister’s Questions session in the House of Commons. This despite the outcomes of the police investigation that created more damage to the Prime Minister’s reputation. The clamor for his resignation now includes calls coming from members of Johnson’s own conservative party.

Jan182022 by Grey DelmaNo Comments

Why some Countries are Restricting Specific Shows or Channels on TV?

Law, Political game, Political Play, Politics, Safety, Security

Television has become a staple in our society, but does this mean we should be allowed to watch whatever and whenever we want? Many countries have restricted the viewing of certain TV shows at times for specific reasons. For example, some countries restrict children’s TV shows during school hours or ban movies with nudity. These restrictions are designed to protect children and limit their exposure to inappropriate scenes. Here are reasons why countries restrict TV shows.

Protecting Children from Inappropriate Scenes

Some countries have been known to restrict certain TV shows for children because they can be more harmful than adults. For example, some TV shows are more likely to use strong language or depict inappropriate scenes that could harm children.

Limiting Exposure to Bad Influences

Many countries believe that children are exposed to bad influences on TV shows. Whether it’s sex, violence, or alcohol use, exposure to these things can have a lasting effect on children and cause further harm in the long-run.

Some countries have put bans on TV shows with sex scenes or nudity because they are worried about the lasting effects of this type of content. Other countries have put restrictions on TV shows during certain hours for this reason as well. These restrictions aim to limit the amount of time children spend watching TV and prevent them from being influenced by what they see.

Preventing Moral Decline

TV shows are among the most influential forms of media. The fact that they’re watched 24 hours a day, 7 days a week means they have a huge impact on society. For example, many countries have banned movies and TV shows with nudity because of the strong influence they can have on children. Countries hope that by restricting TV shows during school hours or banning certain movies, it will reduce moral decline and protect children from viewing inappropriate scenes.

We understand that countries are doing this to protect minors. But how about those who are in the right age and want to watch shows or channels that are banned? That’s where IPTV comes in. It can provide you a library of shows that will definitely fill in your entertainment needs.

Jan102022 by Arden DenverNo Comments

How Great Recruiters are Made from Political Science and Law Graduates

Politics

Law Graduate

 

Questioning into how the transition was and if any crossovers occurred, still as to why they selected the change, we spoke to current Barrington James employees who started their career as Political Science/Law graduates.

What made you opt to pursue a career in recruitment over law?

  • Coming out of university, I didn’t realize how expensive it’s to continue pursuing law! Looking into recruitment and chatting with people within the industry it had been clear that the duty has transferrable skills, whilst making good money it had been also a good way to continue developing my confidence, attitude, and work ethic!
  • More autonomy over your workload than a legal career is what a career in recruitment offers from firms such as the Duffy Group. I liked the thought of being chargeable for my desk with the rewards being directly proportional to the trouble that I put in.
  • The job market and stability. After I graduated, we were within the heat of the 2020 election and there weren’t any perm roles within the Raleigh area. Had I taken the prospect to figure on the Biden campaign, there was no guarantee about having employment past Nov 2nd. I wanted stability, so I moved off from politics to an identical field, which was recruiting.

What crossovers have you ever found between your degree and your recruitment role?

  • The hard work! Like in law, there’s no success overnight. You get what you place in out of recruitment and also the more effort and dedication you place within the more rewards you receive.
  • Resilience, organization, and problem-solving.
  • Being able to grasp peoples’ motivations and effectively communicating with a range of individuals seem to be the most important crossovers.
  • Marketing, cold calling, fundraising, debating, convincing people to require to listen to you out, and most vital to my job, research.

What skills have you ever developed that aided you in recruitment?

  • Organization, tenacity, and ambition!
  • A large part of my degree involved advocacy; using my skills of persuasion to sell my argument, react to counterpoints, and “argue my case”. Having the ability to think quickly and sell the advantages of a task, that you simply know would be perfect for a candidate, is imperative for achievement in recruitment.
  • I think being analytical may be a good skill to possess for recruitment. Gaining a deep understanding of the pharmaceutical industry and my market (Market Access/HEOR) takes time, but i think my background has helped thereupon.

 

ALSO READ: Political Education Is More Important Now

 

What correlation have you ever found between people who studied law, and people working in the US recruitment market?

  • I desire we all have the power to talk with differing kinds of individuals and understand their skills and motivations, all while having a level of empathy.
  • There are lots of folks. The fields are similar. Both are people-focused, driven, high-energy, and fast-paced, as both are really competitive.

Has recruitment always been a career choice? Had you considered it before Barrington James?

  • Recruitment wasn’t an option on my behalf of me initially, popping out of university I used to be adamant to remain within the sphere. Looking back at it now I wouldn’t change a thing! Recruitment has given me the possibility to develop financial freedom.
  • I began to consider recruitment after graduating. I had done some legal work experience and both the workload and therefore the working environment seemed dull. I knew that I wanted a career in recruitment at Barrington James after exploring the responsibilities of a recruitment consultant and seeing how lively the BJ sales floor office was on my interview day.
  • I am also a people person, so planning to speak with people on the phone constantly was something I used to be comfortable with.

What advice would you give to those currently studying a law subject who are puzzling over a career in recruitment?

  • Go for it! There’s nothing stopping you from being successful outside of Law. There also aren’t many roles with such earning potentials so quickly after university!
  • Recruiters are a number of the friendliest people going so my advice would be to achieve dead set people within the industry and have a talk with them! If you would like a career that offers the fantastic earning potential, responsibility from day one, and a good social scene, then recruitment is for you.
  • There is no limit to your earning potential and also the buzz you get is exciting (much in Law!).