Can Trump Accept A Defeat In The Presidential Race Easily?

Can Trump Accept A Defeat In The Presidential Race Easily?

News, Politics

The American people only have a few weeks to go before they witness the next president of the United States being elected. Per the latest pre-election surveys, the presidential race remains tight between the Republican and Democrat bets, the incumbent US President Donald Trump and former Senator and former Vice President, Joe Biden. It is still pretty early to say what will this year’s election bring to the country, but as people always say, we should be prepared for the worst things to come.

For sure, we already know what will happen if Trump wins his second term as the most powerful man in the White House, seeing how he performed over the last four years. However, IF EVER the POTUS loses his reelection bid, are we ready for what’s going to go down?

The Credibility of The 2020 Presidential Election Will Surely Be Questioned

Prior to the beginning of the presidential campaign period this year, President Trump has already been vocal about having the national elections on schedule. As we all know, the current COVID-19 pandemic is hindering all kinds of events and gatherings, especially in crowded public spaces. To avoid the people going to polling precints, where there is a high risk of catching the dreaded coronavirus, it has been decided to allow the voters to cast their ballots by sending them via mail. This proposition seems like a first time in American history, although it was already done before, and the outcome of that election turned out well.

This time around, thanks to highly modernized technology, counting votes sent via mail can be done more efficiently and swiftly, but the issue here is how can the election committee ensure that the votes of the American people are protected. This is the same sentiment of the POTUS, saying that in this kind of voting system, there is greater risk of corrupting the legitimate votes.

Now, if ever President Trump loses in this election, this issue will surely be brought up once again. Based on Trump’s comments and statements throughout the election campaign, it is likely that the president could put the blame on the Democrat party for manipulating the result of the 2020 elections. If only the system in place for the election is the same as https://buypetsupplyonline.com then there won’t be a question about the validity.

A lot of things may happen regarding the possible complaints about the election results, but one thing is for sure: Trump is going to have a hard time believing that he lost.

cccccccccccccccccccccccccc

There Is Strength In The Beard

General

These pertain to all forms of beards that men have stood or let down over the millennia of human history. So if you want to get a beard, the choice will be difficult even if you opt to get it through a beard enhancer (Bartwuchs). Politicians should also consider whether it is even appropriate in our disrespectful times to bear the signs of power and masculinity openly on one’s face.

Why don’t politicians have giant beards anymore?

It is said that in the beard lies the strength, the substance, and therefore the potency of a man, and whose beard is really big; he will have a lot of luck in life, but at the same time bearded people are considered to be easily vulnerable. Especially when they are small, as every child learns from Hauff’s fairy tale “Snow White and Rose Red”, where the evil dwarf jams his long beard while splitting wood so that it is helplessly attached to the block of wood and can only be freed by cutting off part of its beard. But with which it also loses part of its substance, because according to old beliefs (or superstitions) whoever allows their beard to be taken from them submits to the violence of the other.

Nowadays politicians don’t necessarily have to split wood. But a beard also creates other dangers. And again, beards, in particular, are more susceptible to attack than the clean-shaven (to which the clever and cunning Caesar belonged). They constantly have to be prepared for someone to “grab their beard”, which they cannot always prevent. Otherwise, there would not be the saying “God does not let himself be gripped by the beard”, which implies that human beards sometimes have to put up with this from evil fellow men. It also follows from this saying that God also belongs to those who wear beards, which the bearded theologian Paul Schulz, who considers God to be a mathematical formula, vigorously denies, but this is much easier to imagine than a God,

Incidentally, razors: to consider it a modern invention would be completely wrong! The razor is already documented in literature from the time of the Homeric poems. (For both shaved and unshaven doubters, I immediately mention the source: Horn. II. 10,173.) And, as archaeologists assure, there are finds of razors from much earlier times.

While the Minoan Cretans shaved, the early inhabitants of Greece throughout the archaic period only needed the razor to shave their upper lip; She let chin and cheek hair grow. The custom of the Greeks, who in the classical period – bearded portraits of Pericles, Plato, and Sophocles show it – gave the beard wide leeway, the Etruscans also seem to have followed. The Romans also wore full beards until the first barbers came to Italy around 300 BC and the Romans shaved.

The UK’s Long-Term Plan for Addressing Mental Illness Among British Adolescents,

General, Health, Society

Mental illness among adolescents has become a major social problem, for which countries like the UK formulated solutions to help arrest the continuing rise.

There are several factors that can cause mental health disorders among Britons, especially now that the COVID-19 pandemic is on its second wave. Yet the UK government is raising public awareness that adolescents are in a critical stage that makes them vulnerable to mental illness. Based on the most recent data collected, the UK government found out that one in every seven (7) adolescents between ages 11 to 16 year old, have been diagnosed with potential mental health disorder.

Moreover, the data also revealed that by the time those youths reached the age of 14, about 50% were confirmed as mentally unwell. Even more alarming is that 75% of those pre-diagnosed, were suffering from serious mental health problems at age 24.

Schools Play an Important Role in Detecting Mental Illness Among Adolescents

Schools in England play an important role in detecting adolescents likely suffering from mental illness. In recent years, not a few schools have bee making referrals to the the government-funded healthcare system, the National Health Services (NHS), concerning students needing mental health treatment. During the recent 3 years, the number of school referrals grew by more than ⅓,. Over a 4-year period, 55% of those that received referrals for mental health treatment came mostly from primary schools.

A more comprehensive analysis of the available data showed that in an average class comprised by an average of 30 15 year-old students, the recommendations for mental treatment arose from the following reasons:

  • 1.  Witnessing parents separate;
  • 2.  Experiencing death of a parent;
    3.  Bullying or being bullied
    4.  Proneness to inflicting self-harm

UK Government’s Introduction of the NHS Long Term Plan

In carrying out the government’s policy to undertake actions that will help improve the mental health of UK’s adolescents, a 5-year programme called the NHS Long Term Plan was established. The programme commits to develop mental health services in providing mental treatments to pre-adolescent and adolescents, starting 2020-2021.

The NHS Long Term Plan commits to the continuance of the programmes over the next 10 years, by broadening access to government-funded mental health services by way of community-based centers, including setting up support services in schools and colleges.

Other programmes include making Relationship Education a compulsory subject in state-funded primary schools. The topic advances to Relationship and Sex Education for students in the seconday level. In both programmes, pupils will also be required to learn about mental wellbeing. In September 2020, the Department of Education has made these subjects compulsory in all state-funded schools.

UK Government Also Highlights the Need to Provide a Supportive Environment for Adolescents

Still, as these programs can only help prevent the increase in mental health illness among UK’s youth, the government still highlights the importance of a supportive environment involving family and peers. Even the simple act of gift-giving can contribute to building a protective environment in combatting and mitigating the risks of mental illness among adolescents.

While choosing gifts for adolescents especially those aged 14-year old, gifting a son or a relative with something related to his interest or hobbies is a confirmation that you are aware of his current activities. Listening to what a beloved teen often talks enthusiastically about, are good enough clues for finding a gift that will show how much people around him truly cares.

Liberalism On Instagram

News

Instagram, The Show of Liberalism After Floy’d Death

If you’ve logged into Instagram in the days following the murder of George Floyd by Derek Chauvin, a Minneapolis Police Officer, the platform had been unrecognizable. Instead of the typical series of photos, you’ve likely seen an outburst of hyped-up content that didn’t have a name. The News Republic, however, termed it as “Instagraphics” – an infographics slideshow-style. You’ve probably seen various titles like the following below:

  • Transformative Justice 101
  • How to Talk to Your Racist Family Member Now
  • What is Abolition?

If you use Instagram, you’ve likely seen a similar situation following the weeks after the death of Floyd. Millions have gathered on the streets in cities country-wide. Resources say that these Instagram pages that featured Instagraphics were given a boost by services like buy Instagram followers to increase their engagement and reach.

What is Liberalism?

The word liberalism is conveying very distinctive position in political sense; one is that, a pro-individualist theory of government and people and the other is a pro-statist or what’s better coined as social democratic conception. Students who are into political philosophy have to be mindful of the two theories to be able to steer clear of philosophical confusions that may be resolved by clarifying terms.

Movement in Liberalism

The “Great Switch” as how cultural historians Jacques Barzun notes taken place in late 19th century; this is a switch wherein the product of shifting political grounds towards social democratic or socialist policies are under the umbrella of politics and liberal parties.

Etymologically, the latter is a better description because liberalism is actually derived from “liberty”; that is toleration and freedom instead of the notions of justice as well as interventions that took on board in 20th century. Still, pro-statist connotation pervaded modern thinking that it’s hard to separate its concept from previous meanings without reclassifying one or another. The former is typically referred as classical liberalism, which leaves the latter to be unchanged or, adapt to the social democratic liberalism. Modern liberalism is easier to understand term and shall be used until there’s more emphasis laid on socialist leanings of modern liberals.

As how the Public Sees and Understands

In a broader scope, the current accepted term the modern liberal is accepting rights to entitlements like education and healthcare and rights against a person. The two positions don’t go well, at least philosophically but, they are producing tons of great potential as well as recurrent contradictions and inconsistencies that may be solved only by stretching the freedom’s definition.

There are instances in which it generates hard and insurmountable issues and challenges for those who are seeking to combine modern and classical doctrines. Nonetheless, modern liberal project is pursued actively by known thinkers like Ronald Dworkin, Will Kymlicka, John Rawls, J.S. Mills and so forth. Among these writers, historical emphasis on plurality, justice and toleration underscores their work. They differ on interpreting private and public roles, toleration and perceived needs for opportunities be created or not.